Komara Gounder Chinnusamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The PCIT has revised assessment order passed by the AO u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act, on the issue of trade discount received by the assessee from M/s. SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Pvt. Ltd., amounting to Rs.23,16,261/-. According to the PCIT, although, the assessee has received trade […]
Kaliannan Ganesan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) It transpired that the assessee made cash deposits of Rs.13.30 Lacs post demonetization as tabulated assessment order. Accordingly, the assessee was directed to substantiate the source of the same. The assessee is stated to be engaged in poultry farm business and trading of eggs. AO held that there was […]
ITAT Chennai held that the VAT payment would not attract the provisions of section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act and hence, is allowable u/s.37 read with section 43B of the Act
ITAT Chennai held that deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act should be computed after excluding unrealized sale proceeds from export turnover as well as total turnover.
Selvaraj Shanthamani Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Assessee is aggrieved by confirmation of certain additions of Rs.13.51 Lacs which represent deemed letting value of four properties owned by the assessee. Village Administrative Officer has certified that these properties are vacant sites. The said certificates were furnished by the assessee during e-proceedings also. The assessee, vide submissions […]
In absence of details regarding rental receipt from property, explanation of assessee is that cash deposits into bank account is out of rental income, cannot be accepted
DCIT Vs Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) It could be seen that the nature of assessee’s work is such that a part of the contract amount is retained by the customers and the same is released on satisfactory performance of the project. Therefore, the assessee, following consistent method of accounting, defer […]
Deduction of gratuity is available in substantive law and it cannot be disallowed merely by reference of inconsistent entries in explanation of s. 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act being a procedural provisions, it shall not take away right confirmed in s. 37 r/w s. 40A(7) and s. 36(1)(v).
ITAT Chennai held that addition of unexplained income unsustainable as source of money including identity of the creditors is duly explained by the assessee and further the amount has been transferred through proper banking channel only.
ITAT Chennai held that it is fact that under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 declarant cannot challenge sum payable before any appellate forum however once the declarant violates condition of DTVSVS Act 2020 the same can be revived by the Department.
