ITAT Ahmedabad held that amount received as confirming party on sale of right is considered as receipts on sale of capital asset and accordingly, income is held as income from long term capital gain.
Babubhai Ramanbhai Patel vs DCIT – Ahmedabad ITAT rules CIT(A) must discuss case merits before dismissing appeal for non-prosecution. Full analysis here.
Anjana Foundation Vadodara vs A.O.: Ahmedabad ITAT clarifies that advance filing of Form 10B isn’t mandatory for claiming exemption under Sections 11 & 12.
In the case of ACIT Vs Aaryavart Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad ruled that mere maintenance of a bank account with a social co-operative bank cannot be a basis for assuming that the assessee is engaged in accommodation entries. Get insights into the case and the tribunal’s decision.
Learn about the DCIT vs Umang Hiralal Thakkar case at ITAT Ahmedabad regarding filing returns under section 139(1) for claiming deduction under section 80IB. Get detailed insights and analysis.
Dive into the case of Pravinbhai Mumabhai Bharwad vs ITO as ITAT Ahmedabad annuls addition under section 69A, highlighting oversight of cash deposit proofs by AO and CIT(A).
Read about the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Bharatkumar Gangaram Patel vs. ITO case, where the addition for unexplained LTCG on shares was deleted due to failure to establish bogus sale.
Dhirajlal Savailal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) If the receipt is not liable to tax in the hands of the recipient for any reason, the same cannot be a ground for not granting credit for TDS.
Learn about the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Karma Falya Trust vs. DCIT case, granting exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act for delay in filing the audit report.
ITAT Ahmedabad’s verdict exempts individuals not subject to tax audit from TDS obligations, highlighting the Nilesh Patel vs DCIT case.
