Dinesh Kumar vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (District Court of Maharashtra) Pune Additional Sessions Judge Grants Bail in GST Evasion Case In the case of Dinesh Kumar vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (4596/2024), the applicant, Dinesh Kumar, was arrested by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Pune Zonal Unit, for offenses under Section […]
Explore the court order in Divyeshkumar Kanani vs. Central CGST, where the accused gets bail due to exceeding 60 days in judicial custody under GST Act Section 167(2).
The bail application of Rajnish Jain, accused in a GST intelligence case involving fake invoices and ineligible input tax credit, has been rejected by the Sessions Judge in Meerut. The judge cited the seriousness of the charges and the gravity of the offense as reasons for the rejection.
Read the full judgment and order of the Bombay High Court granting bail to Rajesh Kumar Vaishnav in the DRI case involving undervaluation of imported lamination pouches. Analysis of the court’s decision and implications of the case.
Learn about the case of Bechu Kurian Thomas against Qatar Airways, where denial of boarding due to overbooking led to a consumer dispute. Explore the legality of compensation under the Consumer Forum Act, despite lower compensation provisions in the Aircraft Act and Carriage by Air Act.
Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 held that both the accused i.e. Sanjay Raut and Pravin Raut has been arrested illegally as both the accused have satisfied twin conditions under section 45(1)(i)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
District Court New Delhi held that the prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be dismissed or stalled for non-compliance of Section 269 SS of the Income Tax Act. Such violation may give rise to an independent criminal offence, but, the prosecution of the accused for the alleged dishonour of cheque u/s 138 NI Act does not become bad in law.
CGST Vs. Mohd. Sabahuddin (Patiala House Court) Considering that accused has admittedly not joined investigation pursuant to summons dated 19.04.2022 and 29.04.2022 and admittedly did not drop the Google pin location, therefore, has violated condition No.1 and 2 of bail order dated 17.02.2022 of Ld. Predecessor of this Court. Furthermore, since proper reasoning has been […]
Smt. Rakhi Singh Vs State of U.P (District Court of Varanasi) In Gyanvapi case court rejected the Muslim side’s petition and said the suit is maintainable. The next hearing of the case is on Sep 22. Court held that suit of the plaintiffs is not barred by the Uttar Pradesh Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983, […]
In the present complaint, Opposite Parties have tampered with original MRP Price of oil sachet and charged extra amount more than MRP.
