Before ITAT it was submitted by assessee that both the lower authorities have erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte. Revenue also admitted that orders of lower authorities were ex-parte.
ITAT Delhi upholds penalty under Section 271(1)(b) against Sanjay Dalmia for not signing consent waiver form related to undisclosed HSBC bank account details.
ITAT Delhi ruled in Rekha Rani vs. DCIT that penalty under Section 271(1)(b) cannot be imposed for each non-compliance of Section 143(2) notices, only for the first default.
ITAT Delhi quashes Section 271(1)(b) penalty against Charu Modi Bhartia, citing lack of evidence on alleged foreign bank account ownership with HSBC Geneva.
ITAT Delhi partly allowed FIL India’s appeal on tax adjustments, PF contributions, and double taxation of interest on refund under Income Tax Act provisions.
Delhi High Court reviewed the disallowance of ₹7.77 crore royalty expense in AY 2016-17, addressing revenue recognition and matching concepts in income tax appeals.
ITAT Delhi held that orders passed based on illegal assumption of jurisdiction on the basis of satisfaction note which was recorded without application of mind and quite in a mechanical manner is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, addition deleted.
ITAT Delhi limits addition of unexplained cash deposits to ₹10 lakhs in Gaurangi Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO case, providing relief of ₹20.18 lakhs.
The NFAC’s order upheld disallowance of exemption under Section 11 of Income Tax Act and was based on assessee’s delayed filing of audit report in Form 10B. ITAT referred to the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court in ACIT v. Xavier Kelvani Mandal Pvt. Ltd., which held that a belated audit report could be accepted during appellate proceedings.
ITAT Delhi remits case on Section 69A unexplained money addition of ₹11.45 lakh to CIT(A)/NFAC for re-examination. Directions issued for fresh adjudication.
