Read the Delhi High Court judgment in R.K. Metal Industries’ case. Learn why GST registration cannot be arbitrarily cancelled due to non-filing of returns. Retrospective cancellation overturned.
PCIT vs. Minu Bakshi: Delhi High Court Clarifies No Penalty if notice for the imposition of penalty did not specify particular limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which penalty was levied.
CIT (Exemptions) Vs Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation, Delhi High Court emphasized that penalty notice must specify precise limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which penalty is imposed.
In PCIT Vs Bhudeva Estate Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court emphasized that notices for penalty under Section 271(1)(c) must explicitly specify grounds for penalty imposition.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s directive on resolving ITC claim discrepancies due to retrospective GST registration cancellation. Full judgment details of Cuthbert Winner LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner Of CGST & Anr.
Delhi High Court judgment on K. Metal Industries vs Commissioner of GST & Anr. highlights that GST registration cannot be retroactively cancelled without proper reason. Full text and analysis provided.
Pratima Tyagi v. Commissioner of GST: Delhi High Court rules GST cancellation effective from business closure date, emphasizing reason and natural justice
Delhi High Court overturns the cancellation of Aaira Batteries’ GST registration, citing a lack of natural justice. Detailed analysis of the case and implications for businesses.
Delhi High Court grants relief to Travelport LP USA as it upholds CIT’s 15% revenue attribution to PE in India. Full text and analysis of the judgment.
Eleven devices were correctly classifiable under CTH 8517 and more particularly under Tariff Entry 8517 62 90. Echo Show 5, Echo Dot 4th Generation and Echo Dot 4th Generation with Clock were held eligible to claim exemptions in accordance with SI. No. 20 of the Notification dated 30 June 2017, as amended vide Notification dated 01 February 2021.
