Explore the case of Commissioner of Customs (Port) vs. B R Marbles Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Kolkata) where penalties and interest were waived due to court-ordered delays.
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside demand of proportionate Cenvat Credit as the assessee reverses it with interest. Explore the full text of the CESTAT Kolkata order.
CESTAT Kolkata held that central excise duty exemption available under notification no. 108/95-CE dated 28.08.1995 as amended vide Notification No.13/2008-CE dated 01.03.2008 is allowable to appellant as motor vehicle chassis are cleared to the projects funded by International Organization.
In Panihati Rubber Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise case, appellant self-reversed CENVAT credit during an audit, avoiding need for an SCN.
CESTAT Kolkata reduces penalty under Customs Act for exporting Red Sanders Wood. Analysis of the case involving National Agency vs. Commissioner of Customs.
CESTAT Kolkata held that seized gold biscuits cannot be released as transportation of smuggled gold not justified based on fabricated transit challan and held mere general corroboration is sufficient.
In the Ajay Kumar Singh vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) case, penalty upheld for illegal importation of batteries and ammonium chloride. Detailed analysis here.
Read about the CESTAT Kolkata case Commissioner of Customs vs. S N Enterprises. Find out why the redemption fine and penalty were upheld under the Customs Act.
Analyze the CESTAT Kolkata order in Jai Balaji Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, highlighting the issue of levying Service Tax on actual transportation charges, not on provisions.
Read about Madan Kumar’s case where CESTAT Kolkata upholds the confiscation of betel nuts due to failure in providing evidence of legitimacy. Learn more about this customs dispute.
