Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CESTAT Chennai

Reduction in value of machine sold post replacement of important part is normal

July 16, 2023 327 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that differential duty not payable as there is no contravention of Valuation Rules as an important part of the machine sold has been replaced with a less advanced component, slight reduction in the value of the machine sold is found to be normal.

Refund for Mistakenly Paid Duty cannot be denied if claimed within time Prescribed (Section 11B)

July 16, 2023 735 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that refund of duty paid under mistake of law cannot be denied when the refund claim is filed within the time prescribed under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

CESTAT Grants PepsiCo India Benefit of Lower Duty on Fruit Pulp; Reversal of Ineligible Credit Acknowledged

July 15, 2023 549 Views 0 comment Print

Unpacking the latest CESTAT Chennai verdict on the PepsiCo India vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise case, exploring how PepsiCo India was granted the benefit of a 1% duty rate on fruit pulp following a reversal of ineligible credit.

CESTAT confirms demand of differential duty for failure to meet Project Import regulations

July 15, 2023 288 Views 0 comment Print

A critical review of the case between Graphite India Limited and the Commissioner of Customs, with an emphasis on the significance of adhering to Project Import regulations and the implications of not doing so.

Duty exemption on gasket cannot be denied merely due to initial mismatch

July 15, 2023 258 Views 0 comment Print

A detailed look at the case of IGP Engineers Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, where CESTAT ruled that duty exemption could not be denied due to an initial mismatch.

Demand time barred in absence of any willful suppression with intent to evade payment of duty

July 14, 2023 420 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that as all the details are furnished based on which permission for DTA clearance was granted. Accordingly, allegation of willful suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of duty is without any factual basis. Hence demand set aside as time barred.

Upgraded Beneficiated Ilmenite Classifiable under CTH 2823

July 13, 2023 762 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that Upgraded Beneficiated Ilmenite are synthetic Rutile and hence classifiable under CTH 2823 and not under 2614.

Extended period not invocable if department was fully aware of import

July 12, 2023 468 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that extended period of limitation not invocable as department was duly aware about what was being imported and the purpose thereof.

Goods ordered to be provisionally released after complying with requirement are not liable for confiscation

July 12, 2023 576 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that confiscation of goods cannot be sustained as imported goods are provisionally released after complying with the necessary requirement of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955.

Service by branch office in USA to AE situated outside India is not covered under Finance Act, 1994

July 10, 2023 351 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that branch office located in USA rendered the ‘onsite support service’ to its associated enterprise (AE) situated outside India and hence the same is not exigible to tax under the Finance Act, 1994 and accordingly all charges under the Finance Act are set aside.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031