ITAT Delhi held that PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act when in case of debatable issue, out of the two possible views, AO accepts one of the views.
Analysis of Aashirvad Villa Limited Vs ITO case by Kolkata ITAT regarding the proceeding upon intimation passed U/s 143(1) without granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to assessee.
ITAT Delhi allowed the Section 80IA deduction for Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt. Ltd. as it was previously allowed in earlier years and consistent decisions were made in favor of the deduction for the same activity.
Analysis of Maharashtra Seamless Ltd Vs DCIT case where no transfer pricing adjustment was needed as the assessee earns interest at arm’s length rate.
ITAT Chennai held that transfer pricing adjustment towards brand development services unjustified in absence of contract amongst the assessee and its associated enterprises. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards brand fee adjustment.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained share application money is unsustainable as assessee has successfully discharged the burden of proof primarily casted upon it, however, AO failed to conduct independent inquires.
Explore case of Manipal Hospitals (Dwarka) Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT where ITAT Bangalore ruled that AO cannot make adhoc disallowance under Section 40A(2)
Delhi ITAT ruled that once the Income Tax Officer accepts income based on depreciation plus 15% markup, denying cost is unjust. Full analysis here.
Anjana Foundation Vadodara vs A.O.: Ahmedabad ITAT clarifies that advance filing of Form 10B isn’t mandatory for claiming exemption under Sections 11 & 12.
Anamika Kala Sangam vs. DCIT: Kolkata ITAT ruling allows organisations to claim expenses against gross receipts, even if not entitled to Section 11 benefits. Read more.
