Bangalore ITAT remits the case back to the AO for fresh consideration, citing enhancement made to taxpayer’s income without following procedures under Sec 154.
Indore ITAT ruling in Mohammad Ibraheem Khatri vs ITO case highlights that depositing cash after demonetization is not a reason to doubt cash availability.
In the case of Mohd Shahid Mohd Yusuf Qureshi Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), an ex-parte order was remanded due to denial of proper opportunity. Full analysis here.
Naresh Chandra Kalwani Vs PCIT case discusses excess stock, business assessment, and the applicability of section 69/69A/115BBE under Income-tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai deletes addition on whole amount from sale of shares in Nikunj Kaushik Shah Vs ITO case, criticizing unwarranted litigation, incompetence & casual approach
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D deleted as tax free funds were more than investment made on which exempt income was earned.
ITAT Delhi held that TDS is required to be deducted under section 192 of the Income Tax Act on the reimbursement of LTC (Leave Travel Concession) /LFC (Leave Fare Concession) and HTC (Home Travel Concession).
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act by treating transaction of sale of shares of Sunrise Asian as a bogus penny stock unsustainable as material on records supports genuineness of the transactions.
ITAT Mumbai rules no addition under section 68 based on turnover declared under section 44 AD of Income Tax Act for Kalpesh Kantilal Gada. Detailed analysis and order explained.
Read about Rajesh Laxmikanth Varnerkar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) case where the assessee couldn’t reach the tax consultant due to business dislocation, leading to a remand order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act.
