Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manorma Sinha & Anr. Vs Divisional Manager (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manorma Sinha & Anr. Vs Divisional Manager (Supreme Court of India) When High Court Undervalued a Life, Supreme Court Restored Dignity- Supreme Court restores fair compensation by correcting Patna High Court’s flawed computation- From ₹38 Lakh to ₹74 Lakh – Supreme Court Sets the Math Right In this case, the family of a 27-year-old engineer employed with Power Grid Corporation of India (a PSU) had been awarded ₹88.20 lakh by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, applying a 50% future prospects addition, including all allowances reflected in the salary slip, & deducting only 50...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930