Case Law Details
State of Telangana & Ors. Vs Tirumala Constructions (Supreme Court of India)
The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on a significant case involving State Value Added Tax (VAT) amendments made post-Goods and Services Tax (GST) implementation in Telangana, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. This judgment has far-reaching implications for the state taxation landscape.
A. Interpretation of Section 19
The core issue revolved around the interpretation of Section 19 of the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016. Section 19, enacted as part of the GST transition, served as a transitional provision to ensure the continuation of existing laws until they were amended or repealed. The case hinged on whether Section 19 was considered a part of the Constitution, a question vital to the broader discussion.
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 19, although not integrated into the Constitution itself, was an expression of sovereign legislative power with a limited time frame. It allowed both the central and state legislatures to amend or repeal existing laws during this transitional period. The Court clarified that Section 19 was distinct from ordinary legislation and fell under the umbrella of constituent power. This interpretation ensured the flexibility needed for the changing tax landscape during the GST transition.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
