Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tarun Chandrakar S/o Vs Smt. Kumari Bai W/o (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 In suits falling u/s. 7(iv) of the CF Act, claim for the purpose of court fees and for jurisdiction should be the same. Person not executing the sale deed in question not liable to pay ad valorem court fee. 1. The petitioner/plaintiff is aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court, which has directed the petitioner to pay ad valorem Court fees on the prayer made by him for declaring the sale deed dated 26-3-2012 executed by the respondents No. 1 to 5 in favour of the respondent No.6 as null & void and not benefiting the respondent No. 6. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner is not the exec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930