This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
House possession date Non- disclosure is abuse of dominant position: CCI
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramesh Kumar Vs Chandigarh Housing Board (Competition Commission of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramesh Kumar Vs Chandigarh Housing Board (Competition Commission of India)
Introduction The Competition Commission of India recently examined a notable case between Ramesh Kumar and the Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB). The primary point of contention revolves around whether CHB abused its dominant position, especially concerning the non-disclosure of house possession dates.
Non-disclosure of House Possession Date
Relevance of Section 4: The Commission delved deep into Section 4 of the Act to determine if CHB’s actions constituted an abuse of their dominant position.
Observations from Hou...






