This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Arbitrator Appointment not possible if jurisdiction of Designated Officer cannot be invoked by both parties to dispute
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- South Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Supreme Court of India )
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Supreme Court of India)
Conclusion :- The agreement between the parties provides the competent officer and the Commissioner with supervisory control over the execution of work and administrative control over it from time to time and thus to prevent disputes. The intention is not to provide for a forum for resolving disputes. Thus, no Arbitrator could have been appointed by the High Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Facts :-
As per clause 16 of the agreement only the party dissatisfied...







