Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ranveer Singh Vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : CRL.REV.P. 99/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/08/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ranveer Singh Vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office (Delhi High Court)

Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court observed that the investigation report cannot be obtained under Section 212(13) of the Companies Act, 2013 if the Person seeking report is not concerned with the case in any manner or in other words, do not comply the mandate of Section 212(1)(a) to (d) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Petitioner in this case was neither a complainant, nor an accused, nor a victim.

Facts: In present facts of the case, the petition was filed on behalf of the petitioner impugning the orders dated 30th July, 2019 and 14th February, 2020 passed by the Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, Delhi. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, praying for an investigation against pertaining to laundering of funds. The aforesaid petition was disposed of by the Supreme Court vide order dated 16th August, 2017 after recording the statement on behalf of the respondent, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) that the government has sanctioned prosecution against the accused persons. SFIO filed criminal complaint no. 720/2017 before the Special Judge (Companies Act) against accused persons. The petitioner filed an application dated 21st February, 2019 before the Special Judge under Section 212(13) of the Companies Act, 2013 to obtain a copy of the investigation report.

The aforesaid application of the petition was dismissed by the Sessions Court vide order dated 30th July, 2019 on the ground that the petitioner had no locus standi to ask for a copy of the investigation report.

A short affidavit dated 6th July, 2021 has been filed on behalf of the respondent wherein it was stated the petitioner has no locus standi to seek the investigation report as the petitioner is neither a complainant nor an accused party in any way.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031