This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Authorized signatory of cheque, not being drawer, cannot be directed to pay interim compensation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lyka Labs Limited Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Lyka Labs Limited Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court held that the signatory of the cheque, authorized by the “Company”, is not the drawer in terms of section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act and cannot be directed to pay interim compensation under section 143A.
Facts- The issue involves that whether the signatory of the cheque, authorized by the “Company”, is the “drawer” and whether such signatory could be directed to pay interim compensation in terms of section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (her...
Author Info
