Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Compare the old and new tax regimes for FY 2025-26 to find out which one suits your financial situation, with details on exemption...
Income Tax : Notification No. 36/2025-Income Tax dated 22nd April 2025. For the first time, certain luxury goods priced above 10 lakh will attr...
Income Tax : Understand key differences between legal and tax terms like Act vs Rule, Exemption vs Deduction, TDS vs TCS, and more for better c...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of an auto-rickshaw driver, rejecting a ₹103 Crore income addition, citing insufficient investigation...
Income Tax : Understand the new 1% TCS on luxury goods above ₹10 lakh in India, effective April 2025. Learn which items are included, implica...
Income Tax : CBI arrests IRS officer and private individual for allegedly undermining the Faceless Tax Scheme by leaking confidential info for ...
Income Tax : Understand CBDT's Notification 38/2025 on non-deductible settlement expenses under Income-tax Act for SEBI, Competition Act violat...
Income Tax : Representation highlights long delays at NFAC affecting over 5 lakh appeals, urging CBDT to expedite resolutions and restore taxpa...
Income Tax : ITAT enables e-filing and virtual hearings; over 26,000 e-filings and 1.22 lakh video hearings conducted till Feb 2025, per Minist...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2025 proposes tax exemption on income up to ₹12 lakh, revised tax slabs, and a ₹75,000 standard deduction for...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat ruled that reassessment of deceased person is void ab initio, quashing the order and allowing the appeal in Bharat Ranc...
Income Tax : ITAT Cochin grants 12A registration to Naughty's Pet Sanctuary, ruling against CIT(E)'s decision over trustee honorarium clause....
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules on Usha Chandresh Shah's appeal against treating share sale proceeds as cash credit instead of long-term capital...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC dismisses Balbir Chand Maini's appeal, upholding ITAT's finding of a non-genuine share sale transaction and in...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC affirms ITAT order, treating Chandan Gupta's share sale gain as unexplained income (Sec 68) due to bogus trans...
Income Tax : CBDT notification details income tax exemption for Mysore Palace Board. Covers income from palace, fees, rent from government agen...
Income Tax : CBDT notification clarifies that expenses to settle proceedings under SEBI, Securities Contracts, Depositories, and Competition Ac...
Income Tax : The Central Government notifies the National Mission for Clean Ganga as exempt from income tax under Section 10(46A), effective AY...
Income Tax : The Central Board of Direct Taxes notifies tax collection at source on the sale of certain goods exceeding 竄ｹ10 lakh, effectiv...
Income Tax : Latest income tax rule changes effective April 2025. Form 27EQ updated with new categories for tax collection at source on various...
Key features and notification of IFCI Infrastructure Tax Saving Bonds u/s 80CCF is given below. 1. This bonds will be called “Long Term Infrastructure Bond”. 2. Application can be by individual or HUF only but not by minor through Gurdians. 3. An Individual or HUF can invest Rs. 20000/- in a Financial year to avail deduction under section 80CCF. 4. Rs. 20000/- limit is in addition to 100000/- limit of section 80C, 80CCC, 80CCD 5. Tenure of the Bonds will be 10 Years.
We may in concluding note that the basis on which the assessee is sought to be taxed in the present case in respect of the amount of Rs.32,00,000/ is that there was a dividend under Section 2(22)(e) and no other basis has been suggested in the order of the Assessing Officer.
Even if it is assumed that the assessee was authorized to collect sales tax and retain with it, the same will be chargeable to tax as trading receipt in view of decision of Supreme Court in the case of Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd. v. CIT [228 ITR 253 (SC)].
Keyman Insurance Policy for section 10(10D) is not confined to a policy taken by a person on life of an employee, but also extends to an insurance policy taken with respect to life of another who is connected in any manner whatsoever with business of subscriber.
Where an order passed by the Assessing Officer is subject to an appeal that has been filed, the power of the Commissioner to invoke his revisional jurisdiction under section 263 can only extend to such matters which have not been considered and decided in the appeal.
In all fairness, while hearing an appeal from the original authority, the CIT, the CBDT who is the appellate authority cannot deny the reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioning assessee at whose instance the impugned order came to be passed and which has become the subject-matter of appeal before the CBDT.
It is no doubt true that as per section 92CA of the Income-tax Act, when the assessee goes before the authority concerned on transfer pricing, an opportunity of personal hearing should be granted to the assessee. As far as the present case is concerned, the notice dated 25-8-2009 was sent by the Transfer Pricing Officer intimating the date of personal hearing on 4-9-2009, on which date the petitioner was to file its reply. Admittedly
Receipt number to be quoted in Form 16/16A will be generated by TIN. Receipt number will be generated for the quarterly TDS/TCS statements pertaining to FY 2010-11 and onwards uploaded to TIN. Receipt number generated will be of eight digits (alphabets) and will be applicable only for statements pertaining to FY 2010-11 and onwards.
Once the non-productive asset like urban land is converted into a productive asset like a building which qualifies for exemption, then the assessee can start availing exemption even during the period of conversion of such non-productive asset to productive asset.
We have also carefully examined the decision of Salvinder Singh 109 ITD 241 decided by respected co-ordinate bench wherein, the provisions of section 2(ea) of Wealth-tax Act were discussed and have noted that in that case the assessee had more than one commercial establishments or complexes at different places, so the assessee has owned more than one properly which was undisputedly in the nature of commercial establishments or complexes. Therefore, after ascertaining the very nature of the property as a commercial establishment the same was held as covered under the exception of
