Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Analysis of CESTAT Kolkata's decision in Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs CGST & Central Excise, focusing on alleged clandestine ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Kolkata allows CENVAT Credit to Rexon Strips Ltd., ruling that inputs used in capital goods are eligible, setting aside pri...
Excise Duty : Appellant and SKF India are both subsidiaries of AB SKF Sweden. Appellant & SKF India have agreed to pool & combine their respecti...
Excise Duty : The Settlement Commission held that the rectification of errors under Section 154 was confined to arithmetical or clerical errors ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court held that the agreement between the oil marketing companies indicates that the price of petroleum products agreed un...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Excise Duty : Notification 01/2025 outlines appointments and roles of Central Excise Officers for handling appeals under the Excise Act, specify...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notification No. 08/2022 with immediate effect under public interest provisions....
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amends Central Excise Rules, 2017, removing specific provisos in Rules 18 and 19. Changes take effect imme...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notifications No. 10/2022 and 11/2022 under Notification No. 30/2024, effective im...
CENVAT credit denied: CESTAT directed re-adjudication based on ISD invoices mentioning Mumbai address & not related to manufacturing activities.
Analysis of CESTAT Chandigarh’s order in Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner, quashing excise duty demand on Hemophilus Vaccine due to absence of real manufacturer.
Champion Flavours vs Commissioner CGST: CESTAT Chandigarh rules on interest for delayed service tax refund under Section 11BB, citing legal precedents.
In a landmark decision, CESTAT Mumbai rules in favor of Lear Automotive (India) Pvt Ltd, directing re-adjudication for the recovery of CENVAT credit related to epoxy moulds. Full text analysis included.
Read the full text of CESTAT Chandigarh’s order quashing excise duty demand on auto parts manufacture by NTF (India) Pvt. Ltd. Explore the legal battle, key arguments, and the final verdict.
Explore the CESTAT Bangalore order on Elvina Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Commissioner. Learn about the correct valuation method for physician samples under Central Excise rules.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules against the demand of Cenvat credit on capital goods, citing the absence of suppression of facts. Full analysis and implications in this legal case.
Explore the Ponni Sugars vs Commissioner of Central Excise case. CESTAT Chennai landmark ruling on CENVAT credit, bagasse, and legal implications.
Jai Ba Metals Vs CCE (CESTAT Chandigarh) – Rule 9 will not be applicable When the goods are sold to related persons as well as to independent buyers
Mere lack of supplier response won’t invalidate appellant’s Kraft Paper production. Find out more about this CESTAT Ahmedabad order in this blog post!
