"I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we als... o undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992." Read more >
Araadhya Jain Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Whether surcharge is applicable at respective surcharge slab rate or at maximum surcharge rate in case of the Private Discretionary Trust? In a significant ruling that brings clarity to taxation of Private Discretionary Trusts, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Special Bench has held that surcharge on such […]
Kerala HC rules no separate challenge needed for Sec 263 remand order before appealing revised assessment; restores Malabar Institute’s appeal.
ITAT Mumbai rules Sita USA’s airline software services not taxable in India under FTS or DTAA. Revenue appeals for AY 2014-15 to 2021-22 dismissed.
Regarding disallowance under section 10AA, Tribunal found that services provided by appellant to foreign customers from the SEZ did qualify as exports, thus allowing deduction.
Delhi High Court ruled on the validity of re-assessment proceedings in PCIT-04 vs Ganesh Ganga Investments Pvt Ltd, focusing on borrowed satisfaction and approval under Section 151.
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Schenker India, allowing CSR donations under Section 80G despite mandatory nature. Read key takeaways from the case.
PCIT Vs Greenply Industries Ltd (Gauhati High Court) The Gauhati High Court’s recent judgment in “The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s GreenPly Industries Ltd.” provides valuable clarification on the characterization and resultant tax treatment of excise duty exemptions. The court’s decision, delivered on March 4, 2025, addresses two crucial questions: whether excise duty […]
Bombay High Court rules on tax evasion by Buniyad Chemicals, addressing unexplained credits, money laundering, and regulatory actions. Key legal insights.
Gujarat HC orders 6% interest on delayed tax refunds under DTVSV Act, citing principles of natural justice. Refund delays due to account validation issues resolved.
Supreme Court’s decision in Om Prakash and Another v. Union of India {WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.66 OF 2011} established that offences under the Customs Act were non-cognizable and bailable, requiring a warrant for arrest. This ruling emphasized the need for judicial oversight in the arrest process.
