Pvn Fabrics Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) As regard the demand of duty on cylinder used for printing of packaging material, we find that though the invoice was issued for sale of cylinder but the same was not cleared from the factory and the same was used within the factory since it is used […]
Kabeer Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Since the legal heirs of the diseased assessee in the instant case have not taken any steps to file the revised Form No.36, duly filled up giving the revised name of the party duly verified in the manner as prescribed in the rules, therefore, the present appeal cannot be […]
Nirmal Kumar Minda Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The ground No.2 relates to the addition of Rs.37.50 lacs u/s. 69B of the Act in respect of 6 paintings found at the residence of the assessee. The underlying facts in the impugned issue are that 6 paintings were found at the time of search which were got […]
DCIT Vs Shri Sanjay Singhal (ITAT Delhi) The undisputed fact is that the substantive as well as protective additions have been made u/s 69A r.w.s 115BBE of the Act. A bare perusal of the assessment order clearly shows that no money, bullion, jewellery or valuable article was found during search conducted on 07.04.2017 which is […]
Applicant has obtained the Advance Ruling by suppressing the facts and hence the Order issued in the reference 5thcited is liable to be declared as void ab initio.
Personal loan is an unsecured credit option with no end use restrictions on its proceeds. It usually has quicker disbursal, making it an ideal choice for consumers having urgent financial requirements.
Only for clerical mistake of GSTIN in invoice Government cannot usurp money of a taxpayer & make him run to pillar to post for refund of same.
Nagarathinam Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Since the assessee could not file his return of income under section 139(1) of the Act, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271 F of the Act. There was no response from the assessee against the penalty notice. Since, the assessee failed to file his return […]
State Government Undertaking may be considered as a State instrumentality within the definition of article 12 of Constitution of India, the same cannot be treated as Central or State Government
CESTAT held that since there is no suppression of fact, demand of extended period is not sustainable. Penalty imposed was unwarranted
