Vectus Industries Limited Vs Chif Commissioner (Rajasthan High Court) Heard Mr. Pankaj Ghiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. M.S. Singhvi, learned Advocate General for the State Authorities and Mr. R.D. Rastogi, Additional Solicitor General appearing for Union of India upon whom the copy of the writ petition was served on the direction of […]
The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that while filing the appeal, the petitioner had already deposited 10% of the disputed tax amount and that in view of Section 112 of the RGST Act, if he deposits further 10% of the disputed tax amount while filing the appeal before the appellate authority i.e. the tribunal, the depositing of remaining amount shall stand automatically stayed.
Explore the Karnataka High Court’s decision on Anandkumar Singh’s petition against GST registration cancellation under Section 29 of the CGST Act. Learn about the subsequent appeal and the remedy available.
CIT Vs. Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari Pathpedi Limited (Supreme Court) There are concurrent findings recorded by CITA, ITAT and the High Court that the respondent/Assessee cannot be termed as Banks/Cooperative Banks and that being a credit society, they are entitled to exemption under Section 80(P) (2) of the Income Tax Act. Such finding of […]
Directorate of Legal Affairs, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs is entrusted with defending all indirect taxes matters (Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax and GST) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The Directorate hereby invites applications for internship for the F.Y 2023-24.
Rupa Mahesh Gandhi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) As transpires from the orders of the authorities below, the addition to the income of the assessee on account of unexplained investment in Bombay Stock Exchange of Rs.25,21,525/- and unexplained source of payment of credit card amounting to Rs.3,45,000/- was made in the absence of any details submitted […]
Reserve Bank of India, hereby permits the said Reporting Entities to perform authentication under the Aadhaar Act for the purposes of section 11A of the Money Laundering Act
Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority (CAA) in respect of SCNs issued to M/s Subhash Earthmovers vide Order No. 05/2023-Service Tax Dated: 4th May, 2023 F.No. CBIC-240137/3/2023-SERVICE TAX SECTION-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs CX & ST Wing New Delhi Order No. 05/2023-Service Tax | […]
Nothing can be added or subtracted. We cannot infer anything which is not available in the reasons recorded. Therefore, in the light of the discussion as well as judicial precedent cited (supra) we find that the reasons recorded does not muster the requirements of the law as necessary for reopening of the assessment.
Section 212(6) contemplates that before a court decides to grant bail to an accused, public prosecutor must be given an opportunity to oppose bail application.
