ITAT Jaipur held that non-deposit of employees contribution to ESI and PF within due date as per the respective Act is disallowance by invoking provisions of section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Income Tax Act.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that petitioner ordered to be released from judicial custody due to pervasive breach caused to the mandatory provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Arrest declared to be illegal.
ITAT Kolkata held that revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 initiated in the name of non-existent entity, despite the fact that private limited company was converted into LLP and the conversion was brought to the knowledge of AO, is void ab initio and invalid.
CESTAT Kolkata held that benefit of notification no. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 is available on imported manganese ore lumps, crushed, screened, washed having ‘Mn’ content of 43%/45% (approx).
Karnataka High Court held that withholding of refund without satisfying requirements of provisions of section 241A of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, refund along with interest allowed.
Delhi High Court upholds the decision of Disciplinary Committee of ICAI holding petitioner guilty of professional misconduct as cheques given by Society in good faith were inappropriately encashed.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that the amount of TDS deducted under section 194-IA on assets sold during the process of liquidation should be returned (refunded) back by income tax department into the account of Corporate Debtor.
Karnataka High Court held that Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) should formulate a suitable mechanism to digitize Khata / Katha certificates so as to avoid situations like issuance of Katha in respect of one same property to two different person.
ITAT Jaipur held that initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAB(1A) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the ground and default on the part of the assessee and also without specifying the undisclosed income on which penalty was proposed to be levied is unsustainable-in-law.
ITAT Kolkata held that once the TDS is deducted then the liability resulting from the non-deposit of TDS by the deductor cannot be fasten on the deductee. Hence, denial of TDS credit to deductee unjustified.
