Supreme Court held that when a cell phone is sold along with a charger there is only one Maximum Retail Price and hence charger cannot be taxed separately under Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2007 [UP VAT Act].
The assessee acts as a corporate agent for Max Life Insurance Company in respect of marketing it’s insurance policies. The assessee charges commission from Max Life in lieu of rendering such services.
Karnataka High Court held that interest under section 201 of the Income Tax Act and late filing fee under section 234E leviable for non-deduction of TDS from sale consideration paid to Bengaluru Development Authority [BDA] for allotment of made by BDA.
Delhi High Court held that reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act entirely based on course of survey not sustainable and liable to be quashed. Further, survey in particular year cannot be extrapolated to other years.
Jharkhand High Court held that rejection of refund of statutory pre-deposit merely because refund application was filed beyond section 54 of the Income Tax Act not justified as refund of pre-deposit is vested right of an assessee.
The petitioner is inter-alia, engaged in the manufacture and sale of edible oil. According to the petitioner, the rate of tax on output supplies made by the petitioner exceeds the rate of tax on input supplies.
The Assessee is aggrieved by the information received pursuant to application under Right to Information Act, 2015, whereby the Assessee became aware that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not resumed proceedings in respect of AY 2007-08.
ITAT Mumbai held that exercising revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act by PCIT on the basis of factual misconception is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal allowed and order u/s. 263 quashed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Hence, revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not justifiable as twin pre-conditions not satisfied.
During pendency of the assessment proceedings, respondent No.1 filed application u/s. 245C(1) before the Income Tax Settlement Commission offering additional income of Rs.17 Crores for the assessment years from 2011-12 to 2017-18.
