Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balasaheb Vitthalrao Kadam Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balasaheb Vitthalrao Kadam Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune Deletes Perquisite Additions on Director’s Rent-Free Accommodation – Double Addition Found Unjustified- Statement Given in Survey Cannot Substitute Evidence; Statement Alone Cannot Justify Perquisite Addition When Contradicted by Evidence; ITAT Voids Addition Based on Erroneous Survey Admission Pune ITAT allowed a group of appeals filed by Shri Balasaheb Vitthalrao Kadam, his family members, & co-directors of BSA Corporation Ltd., deleting additions made towards perquisite value of rent-free accommodation allegedly enjoyed by the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930