This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Remands Case as AO Ignored Evidence Submitted Through Online Portal
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, in the case of Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO, has effectively set aside an addition of ₹74,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. The Tribunal found that the lower tax authorities had passed ex-parte orders without properly considering the documentary evidence submitted by the assessee and based the reassessment on an incorrect premise regarding the purchase of property.
The case ...






