Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Remands Case as AO Ignored Evidence Submitted Through Online Portal

Case Law Details

Case Name
Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, in the case of Gangady Venkatram Reddy Vs ITO, has effectively set aside an addition of ₹74,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. The Tribunal found that the lower tax authorities had passed ex-parte orders without properly considering the documentary evidence submitted by the assessee and based the reassessment on an incorrect premise regarding the purchase of property. The case ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *