Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gautam Kumar Sadhu Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gautam Kumar Sadhu Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) This case goes to the root of jurisdiction & demonstrates how an invalid or improper notice u/s 143(2) renders the entire assessment void. Assessee’s appeal reached Tribunal with a delay of 352 days, which he explained by stating that CIT(A) never issued notices to his registered e-mail, & he only discovered the order after inquiring with AO. Tribunal found the cause bona fide condoned the delay in the interest of justice. Assessee then challenged the assessment on two strong legal grounds: No valid notice under Section 143(2) The only 143(2)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930