This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Enquiry? No! AO Did His Job – ITAT Quashes 263 for Mere ‘Inadequate Enquiry’ Allegation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- O.P Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Lucknow
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
O.P Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Assessee, engaged in liquor business, was selected for complete scrutiny with two specific triggers – large cash deposits during demonetization & abnormal sales with lower profits. AO issued multiple notices, obtained month-wise cash sales & deposits, compared GP/NP ratios, verified purchases through Form 26AS, examined stock, unsecured loans, creditors, rent payments, major expenses, & accepted books (audit u/s 44AB). Only ₹1 lakh was disallowed for unverifiable expenses.
Later, PCIT invoked Section 263, claiming AO failed to make prop...




