Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Time-Barred Penalty: ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 270A Order Passed Six Months Beyond Section 275(1)(c) Deadline

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalty Initiated in December, Order Passed in December Next Year – ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 270A Penalty as Time-Barred u/s 275(1)(c) Assessee, challenged the validity of a penalty order passed u/s 270A on the ground of limitation prescribed under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed on 04.12.2020, wherein  AO clearly recorded at para 7 that he was “satisfied that Assessee underreported his income” &  therefore “penalty u/s 270A is initiated.” Further, the penalty notice u/...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,842

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *