Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Usha Rani (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Usha Rani (ITAT Delhi) Tribunal Protects Woman Assessee: No Burden to Prove Creditworthiness of Husband & Sons: Property Investment by Senior Citizen- AO’s Addition Quashed – Family Contributions for Property Accepted as Genuine- ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs.1.10 Cr Addition Revenue appealed against order of CIT(A) deleting addition of Rs.1,10,25,000/- made u/s 69 on account of unexplained investment in property. AO reopened assessment based on AIR information that Usha Rani, a senior citizen, purchased property for Rs.1,05,00,000/- (her share) plus Rs.5,25,000/- stamp duty. AO held t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930