Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Batar Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Batar Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) No Second Chance for Fishing Enquiry- AO’s Plausible View Cannot Be Replaced by PCIT’s Suspicion- PCIT Cannot Step into AO’s Shoes: Jaipur Tribunal Quashes Revision Background Original assessment completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 18.03.2023 at returned income of ₹19,89,250. Issue: During survey, it was found that Matrix JEE Academy (tenant) had allegedly paid ₹75,00,000 cash advance to assessee for building construction. AO in reassessment proceedings (u/s 148) considered assessee’s replies, accepted declared income, & made no addition on ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930