Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sharada Narayanan (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sharada Narayanan (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: Sale of Jewellery Inherited Through Will – Addition u/s 56 Deleted Background Assessee, Smt. Sharada Narayanan, declared LTCG of ₹6.29 crore on sale of jewellery valued at ₹7.09 crore, claimed as inherited from her late mother-in-law Smt. Kasturi Shoury through a notarized Will (dated 28.06.2007, disclosed after 7 years). The jewellery was sold to M/s Navarathan Jewellers, Bangalore between June 2015 and February 2016. Assessee reinvested ₹6.45 crore in a residential house, claiming exemption u/s 54F. AO’s Assessment AO rejec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930