This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Disallowance of claim of expenditure cannot be basis for levy of penalty u/s. 270A: ITAT Jaipur
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Urmila Rajendra Mundra Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Urmila Rajendra Mundra Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
ITAT Jaipur held that merely the claim of the assessee was not entertained it cannot be a reason automatically to levy the penalty for misreporting or under reporting of the income. Accordingly, levy of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act set aside.
Facts- Assessee has preferred the present appeal mainly contesting that CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi has wrongly confirmed the levy of penalty u/s 270A of Rs. 2,03,488/- considering disallowances of interest capitalized of Rs. 4,89,159/- for calculation of capital gain (index value of Rs. 4,19,720/-)...




