Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urmila Rajendra Mundra Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmila Rajendra Mundra Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that merely the claim of the assessee was not entertained it cannot be a reason automatically to levy the penalty for misreporting or under reporting of the income. Accordingly, levy of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act set aside. Facts- Assessee has preferred the present appeal mainly contesting that CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi has wrongly confirmed the levy of penalty u/s 270A of Rs. 2,03,488/- considering disallowances of interest capitalized of Rs. 4,89,159/- for calculation of capital gain (index value of Rs. 4,19,720/-)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930