Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arif Munir Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arif Munir Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) ITAT Lucknow deletes Section 69A addition: Cash deposit in Bank from wife’s cash withdrawals held explained Lucknow Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal & deleted the Sec 69A addition of ₹2.44 lakhs made on account of cash deposits.  Tribunal found Assessee’s explanation regarding the funds originating from his wife’s earlier bank withdrawals, to be credible & uncontroverted by the Revenue. Assessee, a retired government servant, had deposited ₹2.44 lakhs in a joint HDFC bank account with his wife. He explained that the funds cam...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930