This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Sec. 36(1)(viia) Bank Bad Debt Deduction to Be Computed on Monthly Average Advances
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- State Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
State Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
A Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has ruled that deductions for provisions made for bad and doubtful debts under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 6ABA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, should be allowed on the total outstanding advances, including opening balances, and not merely on incremental advances made during the year. This decision, in the case of State Bank of India Vs. ACIT, resolves a conflict among ITAT benches and aligns with judgments from the Calcutta and Madras High Courts.
The...
