Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Mismatch in Gold Dore Content Not Sufficient Proof for Customs Duty Evasion

Case Law Details

Case Name
Naresh Vijayvargiya Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Naresh Vijayvargiya Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, has set aside a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs imposed on Naresh Vijayvargiya, former Chief Financial Officer of MMTC-Pamp India Pvt. Ltd., in a case involving alleged customs duty evasion on imported gold dore bars. The tribunal ruled that a mere mismatch in gold content between initial and final invoices, without proof of a conscious effort to evade duty, is not sufficient to attract penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962. The case origin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *