Case Law Details
Case Name : Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that confiscation of goods cannot be sustained as imported goods are provisionally released after complying with the necessary requirement of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955.
Facts- On the basis of intelligence that “Monosodium Glutamate”, a food additive used as flavouring agent has been imported in violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (PFA Rules) read with provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, the D.R...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

