Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : H H Patel & Company Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
H H Patel & Company Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that confirmation of differential duty necessarily has interest liability appended to it. Accordingly, liability to pay interest on duties short-paid at the time of clearance of goods for captive consumption does not get erased. Facts- The appellant is in the business of manufacturing ‘loose zarda’, by deploying raw materials in specific proportions to obtain batches of 3165 kg, and had been clearing the same to their branches upon discharge of duties of central excise on cost for the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930