This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT allows Interest on delayed Sanction of Refund Claim under Rule 5 of CCR
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Capita India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Capita India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
Counsel for the appellant placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. UOI; 2011 (273) ELT 3 (SC) which, according to learned Counsel, has laid down that interest on delayed refund is payable under section 11BB ibid on the expiry of period of three months from the date of application. Learned Commissioner tried to distinguish the aforesaid judgement passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court by observing that in the said judgment the Hon’ble Supreme C...




