Transitional Credit Issue- Decide on Taxpayer representation: HC

By Editor4 Goods and Services Tax Judiciary July 15, 2020

Case Name: Ankit Babeley Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number: Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order: Only available for paid members
Courts: All High Courts, Madhya Pradesh HC

Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Ankit Babeley Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Petitioner was unable to file Trans-1 within permissible time and requested to allow the petitioner to file the same so as to enable him to claim transitional credit of eligible duties in respect of inputs held in stock on the appointed day in terms of Section 140(3) of the Act. It was urged that no heed was paid by the respondents. Accordingly, a prayer was made that respondents be directed to consider and decide the said representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not object to the said prayer and st...

This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.