This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Amortized cost of tools cannot be added to arrive at value of goods supplied for GST
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re M/s. Nash Industries (I) Pvt.Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAAR, AAR Karnataka, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
In re M/s. Nash Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka)
The appallate authority for advance ruling has set aside the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR ADRG 24/2018 dated 25/10/2018 i.e. Contention of the appellant is allowed based on examination of the contract and purchase orders furnished.
Question- Whether the amortized cost of the tools is to be added to arrive at the value of the goods supplied for the purpose of GST under Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 27 of CGST Rules, 2017?
AAAR set aside the ruling of the AAR an...
