CA Saurabh Chokhra

Brief of the case:
- The Hon’ble Gujarat HC in the above cited case held that a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO )can be made only after passing a speaking odder disposing off the objections raised by assessee. In the present case since, the reference was made without passing such a speaking order, the reference so made was invalid.
- Therefore, AO required to make fresh reference after passing a speaking order.
Facts of the case:
- The petitioner reached to High court by filling a write petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The assessee in the present petition challenged that despite the specific instructions issued by the CBDT issued vide Instruction No.3/2016 dated 10th March, 2016, by which,before making a reference to the TPO, the Assessing Officer is required to deal with the objection raised by the petitioner assessee and is required to pass a speaking order disposing off the same.
Contention of the Revenue:
- Revenue contended that the assessee has itself accepted that it has entered into specific domestic transactions , therefore, reference made by AO to TPO to validate the transfer price declared by assessee was valid and for that no requirement of passing speaking order.
Held by Hon’ble Gujarat HC:
Paid content
Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.





