Case Law Details
Case Name : Bajrang Prasad Ramdharani Vs Asst. CIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Requirement of the section 10(13A) is that any allowance (by whatever name called) granted to an assessee by his employer to meet expenditure actually incurred on payment of rent in respect of residential accommodation occupied by the assessee, to such extent as may be prescribed.
However, the exemption is not available in case the residential accommodation occupied by the assessee is owned by him or the assessee has not actually incurred expenditure on payment of rent (by whatever name called) in respect of the residential accommodation occupied by him.
Admittedly, the AO has given a finding ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Impromptu (clarifying own thoughts/view):
None, without offending own intelligence or intellect, can dispute that even though a female, after wedded to a male, becomes the better-half but they still in the eyes of law continue to be ‘individuals’, for all prectical purposes; particuarly, for tax purposes.
Be that as it should,so long as it is not regarded and proved to be a ‘colorable’ (or wantonly ‘colored’) device, and the house property in question actually and factually ‘belongs’ (within its legal meaning) to the wife,rent paid, simply because payment is to own spouse, cannot be meted out with a disallowance.