Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Delay Caused by Pending Section 154 Rectification Deserves Condonation: Bangalore ITAT

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 6027
Case Name
Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Filing Rectification U/s 154 First Is Valid Reason for Delay – Bangalore ITAT Revives Appeal in Demonetisation SBN Deposit Case The Bangalore ITAT held that pursuing a rectification application u/s 154 before filing an appeal constitutes a valid and bona fide reason for delay in filing appeal before the CIT(A). Accordingly, the Tribunal condoned a 73-day delay and restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits. The assessee’s case had been selected for limited scrutiny to examine cash deposits during the dem...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,047

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *