This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delay Caused by Pending Section 154 Rectification Deserves Condonation: Bangalore ITAT
Case Law Details
- TaxGuru Citation
- 2026 taxguru.in 6027
- Case Name
- Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Filing Rectification U/s 154 First Is Valid Reason for Delay – Bangalore ITAT Revives Appeal in Demonetisation SBN Deposit Case
The Bangalore ITAT held that pursuing a rectification application u/s 154 before filing an appeal constitutes a valid and bona fide reason for delay in filing appeal before the CIT(A). Accordingly, the Tribunal condoned a 73-day delay and restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
The assessee’s case had been selected for limited scrutiny to examine cash deposits during the dem...





