This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
P&H HC Upheld Bail Condition as Earlier Challenge Already Decided
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sahil Jain Vs Superintendent (Anti Evasion) (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Punjab and Haryana HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sahil Jain Vs Superintendent (Anti Evasion) (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
The Punjab and Haryana High Court adjudicated a petition filed under Section 484 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of a bail condition requiring the furnishing of a bank guarantee or fixed deposit receipt (FDR) of ₹50 lakhs. The petitioner contended that the earlier surety had withdrawn and that he was financially incapable of complying with the condition.
Read SC Judgment in this case: SC Set Aside ₹50 Lakh Bail Condition as Excessive Despite Prior HC Approval in FAKE invoice Case
The petiti...
Author Info
