Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shrishail Dhulappa Honavad Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shrishail Dhulappa Honavad Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No bills ≠ bogus: Bangalore ITAT deletes Sec 69A addition on agricultural income In this case, the assessee had declared agricultural income from cultivation carried out on about 39 acres of land, and the Assessing Officer accepted neither the full claim nor the explanation for a portion of receipts amounting to Rs. 7,00,761. The addition was made under section 69A merely because bills and vouchers were not available for certain local market sales and for an amount routed through the assessee’s son. The Tribunal noted that the ownership of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031