Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Siddartha Girijashankar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Siddartha Girijashankar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Cash Deposits in Partner’s Personal Bank Account Explained as Firm’s Business Receipts – Addition U/s 69A Deleted The assessee, a managing partner of a petrol pump firm, had cash deposits of ₹6.18 crore in his personal bank accounts. During assessment proceedings, the AO accepted that ₹5.91 crore out of the deposits represented business transactions, as the amounts were transferred to Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and the firm’s bank account. However, the balance ₹26.68 lakh was treated as unexplained and added u/s 69A on the grou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930