This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Set Aside for Vague Limb in Notice: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Solitairian Buildinfra Private Limited Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Solitairian Buildinfra Private Limited Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Quashed – Defective Notice Without Specifying Limb Held Fatal
The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the penalty of ₹5.45 lakh levied under Section 271(1)(c) on the ground that the penalty notice was defective and invalid in law. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had issued the notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) by mentioning both limbs – “concealment of income” and “furnishing of inaccurate particulars” – without striking off the inapplicable...





