This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cheating Charge Quashed as Payment Assurance Lacked Fraudulent Intent: Delhi HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arun Kumar Bagla Vs SCJ Plastics Ltd (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arun Kumar Bagla Vs SCJ Plastics Ltd (Delhi High Court)
The Delhi High Court examined whether a Managing Director’s assurance of payment given in the ordinary course of commercial dealings can, by itself, justify framing of a cheating charge under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of orders by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge that had framed and upheld charges of cheating against the Managing Director after the complaint against the company was dismissed.
...
Author Info
