Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ankur Mittal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ankur Mittal (ITAT Delhi) AO can’t travel beyond 263 directions: ITAT Delhi upholds deletion of ₹12.12 cr u/s 69C; sustains ₹1.16 lakh u/s 69A Delhi Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross-objection. The Tribunal held that while giving effect to a revision u/s 263, the AO must strictly confine himself to the specific directions issued by the PCIT. In the present case, the PCIT had only directed examination of the applicability of section 40A(3) r/w Rule 6DD and related verifications. However, the AO travelled beyond the mandate and made a massive...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930