Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Kumar Goyal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinod Kumar Goyal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi) Section 69C Can’t Be Used for Recorded Purchases: No 145(3), No Disallowance—ITAT Delhi Deletes 12.5% Estimation Assessee, engaged in trading of iron & steel, faced addition of ₹1.03 crore by estimating profit @12.5% of purchases, invoking s.69C on the allegation of bogus purchases, merely because notices u/s 133(6) issued to suppliers were not complied with. AO accepted sales, did not reject books u/s 145(3), and brought to tax only the so-called “profit element”. NFAC confirmed the addition without independent findings. ITAT Delhi allowed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930